The gist of Kosovo politics

The late 1990s so called Kosovo crisis, has slowly but surely disappeared from our television screens and our newspapers.

Why? Well firstly, because there are no Serbs left to blame, seeing how they were ethnically cleansed, murdered and their places of worship repeatedly desecrated by the raging Albanian Muslims of Kosovo (repeatedly wrongly called Kosovars).
And while western politicians sit there silent, secretly hoping that the remaining 10% of Serbs will quietly ethnically cleanse themselves, western media has decided that any violence against Serbs is news not worth reporting.

(Much like any violence, torture and ethnic cleansing committed by Croats and Bosnians against Serbs in former Yugoslavia, is something which was systematically omitted and ignored on behalf western journalists.)

So now we have the ''humanitarian intervention'' went wrong. Initially all humanitarian interventions on behalf of Western powers has gone wrong, or is going wrong as we speak. Albanian terrorists are freely trafficking drugs and sex slaves across Kosovo from Eastern Europe, exporting them to different places, raising revenue, so that the money can be fed back into the Jihad in Kosovo.
One big, fat, vicious circle of destruction and murder, once eagerly aided by Clinton and Blair, helped along by the western media.

Nine years ago, our television screens and news papers were filled with claims of ''genocide'' and mass murder. ''Holocaust'' in some sensationalist gutter press. Recently, no such word has been mentioned. ''Genocide'' lie has slowly disappeared from the news papers, and the ''Albanian victim complex'' withered away into nothingness.
With it, western media lost the interest in the region. Afterall, only the story where one can equate word Serb with a Nazi is the one that would earn some kind of attention.
Everything else just is not important.


Now we face the ''Kosovo Independence'' bleating, inconsistent and ridiculous argument. The call for the illegal amputation of 15% of one countries territory to appease terrorists.

How can a group of people, with already existing mother state, demand the independence of an area of a sovereign country, through threats, terrorism and ethnic expulsion of its native residents?

When the ''I am an Albanian victim of Serb brutality'' card has been overplayed, the ''We will blow you all off the face of the earth if you don't give us what we want'' is being plaid.
What happened to ''we don't negotiate with terrorists''?
Right, I forget. Clinton conveniently named KAL freedom fighting organisation, instead of terrorist one, which is what it was known, before NATO's intervention in Kosovo and Serbia.

Every time Clinton or Blair mention ''humanitarian intervention on behalf of minorities who are opressed'', I cannot help but think of Hitler -

"The wave of appalling terrorism against the [minority] inhabitants of Poland, and the atrocities that have been taking place in that country are terrible for the victims, but intolerable for a Great Power which has been expected to remain a passive onlooker. We will not continue to tolerate the persecution of the minority, the killing of many, and their forcible removal under the most cruel conditions."

(Hitler, August 23, 1939, from letters sent to the UK and French governments, the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives Monitor, April 2003; www.swt.org/share/ancientciv.htm)